Search This Blog

  • Search 2,000+ Posts:
     

Advertisements


Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2003

Elecom Scope Node Mouse

While in Germany last month, my wife allowed me time in Saturn's Kudamm store -- seven stories of electronics that makes BestBuy look like a 7-Eleven. Generally, I don't buy electronics in Europe, because they're too expensive, there might be warranty problems, and returning a defective product to the store becomes r-e-a-l-l-y difficult once back home in North America.

How expensive? Generally, computers and such are priced in Euros what I am used to paying in Canadian dollars -- about 60% more expensive. For instance, my LG netbook was $460 in Canada but e450 in Europe. Now, those prices need to be adjusted for sales tax; the Canadian price excludes 12% tax, the German price includes 19% tax.

This time, however, I bought the Elecom Scope Node Mouse, which looks much better in person than in photographs. Best looking mouse I've ever seen. Designed in Japan. It was e39. Not available in North America.

As is usual for non-Logitech mice, it claimed it would work just fine with Microsoft's generic mouse driver -- a white lie, for the driver does not -- and never has -- support the "middle mouse button", where you click the roller wheel. No driver disk included in the fancy packaging.

On a hunch, I searched for an Elecom mouse driver, and found one that works. For me, "works" means I can program the middle button to perform double-clicks.

Getting the Elecom Mouse Driver

To access the driver, you have to take several non-intuitive steps:

1. Do not go to Elecom's home site in Japan. Instead, go to the site of its European distributor at http://www.ednet-gmbh.de/?lang=en&corp_id=0&page=0

2. Click the Support tab.

3. Download the Generic 32-bit driver for XMouse. (There is no driver specific to the Scope Node mouse, but I guessed that any driver would probably work.)

4. Install, and then run the driver. (An icon appears on the taskbar.)

This driver is meant for a six-button mouse, but I found it works just as well for the Scope Node mouse. There is also a driver available for 64-bit systems.

The Long Tail of Windows 7 Pre-Sales

Microsoft marketing hoped to create a buying panic for Windows 7 by selling a limited number of pre-release boxes at half-price. I monitored the sales rate on futureshop.ca and found instead that customers created a long tail.

FutureShop's Windows 7 Web page initially failed to display on the morning of June 26. Once it did, I refreshed the page every so often to record the "Quantity Remaining" of Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade. (When I checked the site at 9:50am, it was working, finally.)

Initially, the site sold 95 boxes an hour.

By noon (Pacific time; 3pm Eastern), the sales rate plateaued at 65 boxes/hr, a rate that continued throughout the afternoon and into supper time.

Early the next morning, a Saturday, the rate slowed to 41 boxes/hr, with 448 remaining, and then to 30 boxes/hr throughout the morning.

By lunchtime, however, artificial scarcity reversed itself: FutureShop.ca's Quantity Remaining jumped to 1,990. 

Pricing Screwups

When I initially tried purchasing the upgrade yesterday, FutureShop.ca listed the regular price of $130. So I bought it from BestBuy.ca.

Today, the same is happening at BestBuy.ca: the promo page continues to show $65, but upon checkout, the "WorstBuy" price jumps to $130. 

LondonDrugs.ca is little better, its Web page contradicting itself. The "Online Only!" offer is not available for online sale:

Ld

Microsoft Rips Off Canadians (Again)

Windows 7 upgrades are available in Canada today, and once again Microsoft is overcharging Canadians. Whereas the Home Premium Upgrade is $50 in the USA, the price is $65 in Canada -- a surcharge of 30%. The difference in exchange rates accounts for only half the surcharge, 15%. The other 15% is extra profit for the convicted monopolist.

Poor FutureShop, though. Their Windows7 upgrade page was not working 10 hours after the offer was due to begin. On their regular site, only the $130 upgrade price was available for Home Premium. Parent BestBuy Canada's upgrade page does work, however.

Boycott the EU

Every 5-6 days, countries of the European Union kill as many animals for their fur as Canadians do of seals in an entire year. Canada's National Post newspaper calls for a boycott of European products:

The European Union is close to banning all Canadian seal products, and a grassroots campaign to boycott Canadian fish and seafood is gaining momentum.

But what of Europe's own barbaric culinary practices? In response, Full Comment will call attention to European hypocrisy and demand an immediate end to the brutal slaughter of helpless creatures. 

Read the full editorial at Barbaric European Food Practices -- if you can cope with the explicit text, and the even more explicit comments.

DisplayLink? Not Today

I've been reading about displaylink technology that acts like a wireless video cable. It comes in two parts: a USB transmitter that attaches to your desktop computer, and a VESA receiver that plugs into the VGA port of a distance monitor or projector.

It would be the ideal solution for showing stuff that resides on my computer (one end of my office) through my projector (at the other end). Right now, I have to carry a notebook computer over to the projector, try and force the VGA cable on, and then sweat while hoping the projector and computer notice each other. (Last time, they didn't.)

Over the weekend I was in a nearby London Drugs computer department; I think I was the only customer in the store. Two two young computer salesmen asked if I needed any help. I asked them about displaylink. After trying to show me some VGA extenders, we decided they had never heard of the technology. Relieved, they returned to their back room.

Searching the Internet I found why it might not be popular: IOgear's list price is $200 for the technology. I could buy direct from the mfg'er, but not at $200. I might be convinced to spend $100, shipping included.

When 12x Zoom is Worse Than 10x

In the previous posting, I noted that my SX100's 10x zoom is better than the 12x zoom on the new SX200 model. 

  • SX200 -- 12x optical zoom -- 28-336mm equivalent.
  • SX110 -- 10x optical zoom -- 36-360mm equivalent.

This is a case where the optical zoom number is misleading. The "normal" zoom level is 50mm (when there is no zoom). Divide the mm numbers into 50 to get the zoom multiplier (shown as "x" in specs).

SX200

  • 336/50 = 6.7x zoom

SX110

  • 360/50 = 7.2x zoom

So the SX100 gets you 0.5x closer to distant objects than does the SX200. The sole advantage of the SX200's relatively stunted zoom is that the wideangle is much wider, useful for photographs taken inside rooms or of landscapes.

Canon's SX100 Replacement: SX200

When I bought the Canon SX100 as my next digital camera a month ago, I knew it would be superseded some time this year. I just hoped the new model wouldn't be host to many must-have features. Last week FutureShop began stocking the SX100 (and this week parent BestBuy claims to have it as an "exclusive").

Casting an anxious eye over the specs, I am relieved:

  • 12x optical zoom (28-336 mm equivalent) -- less zoom but more wide angle than the 10x zoom (36-360mm equiv) on the SX100.
  • 12 megapixel -- worse than the 8 megapixels on  mine, in my opinion (more pixels means more noise in photographs).
  • high-definition video recording mode -- the primary feature in this new model, and the primary reason for the $110 price increase. But no biggie in my book. 720p is nice, but I'm content with 640x480.

But then came the deal killer, the reason I am glad I got the SX100 instead: the new model has a maximum aperture of f/3.4 -- significantly smaller than the f/2.8 on the older model. For someone like me who takes flash-less photographs, bigger apertures are crucial.

Earth Day Sales

When I read this one-line ad in today's PC World email news blast...

Earth Day Sales
Save up to $640 on select [Lenovo] Thinkpad Laptops through  April 27

...I knew that commercial interests have corrupted yet another day meant for altruistic reasons. Earth Day in on the heap, along with Christmas (most important buying time of the year), Easter (chocolate rabbits), and the other holy-days.

The connection between Lenovo and Earth Day? None, except an excuse to hide poor sales behind an unrelated event.

Getting Ready for My New Camera

One of the benefits of the Internet is that I can read the manual for my new camera before it arrives in the mail.

Canon camera manuals are poorly done, and hard to read. I think that's because they're trying to squeeze all information into 228 half-size pages. Anyhow, I am perusing the PDF file for the SX110 camera, and while most of it is repetitive from other camera models (especially Canons), there are a few new items that intrigue me:

Safety Zoom

In safety zoom mode, the camera balances the maximum digital zoom with resolution to ensure images are not overly grainy:

  1. At max resolutions (9 and 6 megapixel) and widescreen mode, no digital zoom is available.
  2. At min resolution (0.3 megapixel or 640x480), the maximum 4x digital zoom is available.
  3. At inbetween resolutions (2 and 4 megapixel), the max digital zooms  are 1.3x and 2.2x, respectively.

I think what's happening is that the SX110 makes use of the entire sensor surface at lower resolutions to magnify the image.

Multi-shot Self Timer

I seem to need to use the self-timer as rarely as once a year, and we all know the procedure: click the shutter, run over to the group, wait for the picture to be taken, and then run back to check if it turned out. Repeat as necessary.

When multi-shot is turned on, the self timer takes ten photos in a row.

Too Many Options

The drawback to digital cameras is that vendors can cram in too many options. One example is the SX110's many anti-shake modes: off, continuous, shot-only, and panning. I tend to use shot-only (anti-shake starts when the shutter is pressed half-way).

ISO

I am interested to see how this camera handles low-light situations, since I have a disdain for flash. I have become quite good at steadying the camera for evening, night, and interior photos with no flash.

Canon claims a max ISO of 1600, plus a simulated ISO 3200, although reviews say that ISO 400 is the max for clean images. Even 400 would be an improvement over my older cameras.

The SX110 has an ISO boost button, which ups the ISO (light sensitivity) in low-light situations. I think I'l find that handy. However, the G10 is even better, for it has a separate dial dedicated to ISO, just like film cameras used to have.

But ISO is not the only spec important to low-light photography; large aperture matters even more. This camera boasts f2.8, which is good for a consumer camera. (My old Canon G1 was f2.0, which let a lot more light come through.) 

Modes

I tend to think of shooting modes as features invented by the marketing department. I find the clutter of modes annoying, but there are rare exceptions. The Fireworks mode on my current Samsung NV3 works really well, so we'll see what it's like on the SX110.

Continuous Shooting

The continuous shooting mode is improved over my old S1is with live view. In the old camera, there was a lag in the viewfinder, so it was impossible to keep the camera trained on a moving subject, such as my figure-skating daughter. 

Related to this is movie mode, which continues to be weak in Canon cameras. The max resolution is 640x480 -- good enough -- and the largest single movie file is now one hour or 4GB (improved over the S1is). However, Canon still lacks a pause mode, as found in my Samsung NV3.

SDHC

I look forward to seeing how many pictures my 16GB SDHC card holds! Canon estimates 4,000 at the highest resolution and best quality -- and 122,000 at 640x480 and lowest quality.

(I used to own the first 1GB memory card for digital cameras, the 1GB micro hard disk from IBM. The drive broke down after a few years -- and there went $300.)

Custom Folders

As I mentioned earlier, digital cameras have too many features. One that might come in hand is the ability to create folders. When on a trip, it would be handy to segregate photos by folders marked by the date -- the SX110 can create these date-segregated folders automatically.

My very first digital camera had a similar feature: the file name of each picture was today's date, with an increment counter. The first photo taken today would be 90411001 (2009, April, 10, 001). Very handy.

Curiously enough, the SX110 holds a maximum of 2000 photos per folder. I wonder how that number is arrived at.

External Flash

This camera has no hotshoe, but you can buy a screw-on kit that reminds me of cheap film cameras of yesteryear. You screw in a bracket to the camera's tripod socket, and then attach the flash to the other end of the bracket. Usually a cable is required to signal the flash to go off, but there doesn't seem to be one for the SX110 -- maybe the signal is sent through the bracket.

My New Digital Camera

My beloved Canon S1is went wonky some months ago. I was ready to shoot photos of a contractor-friend's latest project when I noticed the viewfinder was black. Annoyed, I press the Display button several times, but both viewfinder and LCD remained black -- except for a purple smear. The sensor was toast.

(Some Canon models are covered by an unlimited warranty, because Sony did a poor job making some of sensors for Canon. The S1 is not covered by this, unfortunately. Nor is it covered by a credit card extended warranty, for I bought it reconditioned off eBay through PayPal.)

What to replace it with?

Increasingly, I had been using the Samsung NV3, a pocket-size camera with internal zoom lens (nothing pokes out) and excellent video. The drawbacks: hard to see the LCD in bright sunlight, and a mode dial that turned too easily so I never was sure which mode the camera was in when I turned it on.

Canon SX10

I had been eyeing the SX10 from Canon. It has a 20x zoom lens, the swivel LCD that Canon pioneered, and would make use of the big collection of rechargable AA batteries I've collected over the years for my G1 and two S1s.

(Over time, however, I have come to prefer proprietary batteries that charge right inside the camera through the USB cable. Externally charged AAs are a bit of a pain.)

But price was a problem. Over Christmas, Staples had the SX10 camera for $398, but the S1 was still working at that time. (Here in Canada, the SX10 list price is $449.) Recently, FutureShop sold it for $415, but had none in stock locally. ("300 have been ordered for the warehouse," the salesman told me.) Plus, I was greedy: I wanted the price to be under $400.

Canon Raises Prices

Then, a couple of stores raised their prices. Even Wal-mart jumped the price from $426 to $455. The Source (Circuit City in Canada) jumped the price from $440 to $480. While I was in Portland this week, I visited a camera store, where the salesman warned me that Canon was raising prices -- as Nikon already had done. Upon my return, BestBuy Canada had already raised their price from $450 to $480. It mattered not that they offered a 10% discount on all cameras today -- that discount brought the price down to $432, still too high.

I checked eBay for reconditioned units, but the camera is too new for that. 

I decided against a digital SLR for two reasons: this class of camera is w-a-y too big and heavy for me, and their zoom lenses have pitiful range against the capability of point'n shooters.

Canon SX110

After seeing the SX10 price increase, I bought the SX110 from FutureShop.ca today. I was torn, for it lacked the 20x zoom and swivel LCD of the SX10. But it had other benefits:

  • Pocket size, important for all the travel I undertake.
  • Almost as good a zoom at 10x.
  • Larger LCD at 3".
  • And a mere $180 reconditioned ($120 off its regular price of $300).

I'll use it for a while, and then see if Canon comes out with an SX20. I'll sell the SX110 to one of my daughters for half-price.

The New Era of Good Enough

Over at Crunchgear, John Biggs asks, "Are we headed into an era of dumb tech?" I'd like to think we are. He asks the question on the heels of Cisco paying a half-billion dollars for the lowest of the low-end video camera makers, Flip Video.

I was glad to read him saying what I've been preaching for several years now, that computer stuff is good enough now -- hardware, software, and accessories.

After a decade of unparalleled one-upmanship -- the gigahertz race, the megapixel race, the storage race -- we are now hitting a wall. The devices we own are small enough, fast enough, and hold enough data to suit us now until 2012, thank you, so we’ll sit this next iteration of the Intel Xaphod chip out, thank you.

We first got the glimmer of our new Era of Good Enough when Asus shipped the first netbook in late 2007. I chortled over the outrage expressed by ceos of large computer companies when they began to realized the low-cost threat. They responded by producing under-spec'd netbooks, but that's another story.

Another glimmer was a poll that showed that most people want a cell phone that makes calls and stores phone numbers. That's not the kind of cell phone we are being sold.

I was amazed at the abilities of my first digital camera, purchased in 1999. Since then, I have become dismayed with the Race to Maximize the Number of Meaningless Features -- 17 scene modes, three options for shutter sounds, customized background images for the LCD on startup, mega-megapixel sensors. Who needs it; who wants it. 

These sorts of meaning features are added, because they are cheap and easy to add. For instance, I am close to buying a new digital camera. Not because I want a new one, but because my 3-megapixel Canon S1is fried its sensor. You'll read in camera reviews about the drawback of 10-megapixel cameras -- they create muddy images because of pixel-packing. My defunct 3-megapixel unit took wonderfully clear photos; I've even enlarged one to 3'x4' for our family room.

As we were being ignored by three salesmen behind the otherwise free-of-customers camera counter at FutureShop last night, I pointed out to my daughter the most important feature on the Canon SX10 I am considering: it has a maximum aperture of f2.8. The similar camera from Fuji maxed out at around f5.6. 

(We finally got the attention of the salesmen when I suggested my daughter pick up the Canon DSLR to feel its weight. The action made the theft alarm go off, and made the salesmen now notice us.)

Cameras are not about megapixels anymore. The two primary fields of improvement are in increasing the aperture and the ISO. And those are hard to improve.

Netbooks Prove Microsoft's Inability to Design

The netbook is keeping the computer hardware business humming, after ASUS invented the category 1.5 years go. It is remarkable that a company that specializes in assembling computers for others was able to come up with a winning formula after software monopolist Microsoft failed when it defined a similar, yet pointless device, the UMPC -- short for ultra mobile personal computer.

What sunk the UMPC was (1) it's price and (2) its touchscreen orientation. You may recall an earlier reference design by Microsoft that also sunk for the same two reasons: the TabletPC. 

Knowing how Microsoft thinks, the initially high target price (roughly $2000) was deliberate. With it, Microsoft was able to fool hardware vendors to go along with their plan to ship more Windows and Offices -- develop and sell expensive hardware to consumers who would fall over themselves to buy it.

Problem is that Microsoft's monopoly is the reason Apple-priced hardware doesn't sell well in Windows' World. Competition between the HPs, Dells, and Toshibas of the world ensures that prices headed to the $500 level. Apple has seen the mistake made by Microsoft, and so keeps a local monopoly on its OS and its hardware.

Never one to have an original thought, Microsoft attempted the same among music players, cutting off its PlayForSure "partners" in order to create a monopolized music delivery and hardware system. But for its efforts (I won't use the word "backstabbing" here), it has a smaller marketshare than does Apple in PCs.

LG X110: Presto Linux/Windows 7 Dual-Boot

My LG X110 netbook came with Windows XP, and I almost immediately installed beta-7000 Windows 7 on it. Today I read about Presto Linux from Xandros (the same people who provide the Linux for my other netbook, the original ASUS EEE 701.)

The Presto forums indicated that it probably would work with Windows 7, so I gave it a try -- especially since uninstalling it was apparently just like unistalling any other app through the Windows Control Panel.

I installed it, and it works. Here's how to do it:

1. Download the 0.5GB file from www.prestomypc.com/get_prestopc.php

2. Install. 

3. Reboot the computer. You have the choice of booting Windows (the default) or Presto. Choose Presto, and then press Enter.

Apps and Customizing

Once in Presto, you can use familiar programs like FireFox 3, Skype (the older, less cluttered version), Acrobat Reader 8, and OpenOffice 3 (handles Office 2007's DOCX format).

Presto's Application Store has many apps for downloading and effortless installing. I immediately added Picasa 3 and VLC (for movies and music)

To start customizing Presto, read this tutorial on the Presto forums.

5x Faster than Windows 7

The point to the name, and the main marketing message, is that Presto boots faster than Windows. Here are the timings for my X110:

  • Boot Windows 7 -- 180 seconds (3 minutes)
  • Boot Presto -- 35 seconds, about 5x faster.

Presto is slower, however, than the Linux on my ASUS netbook, perhaps because it boots from an SSD (solid state disk): just 25 seconds.

(To think that Microsoft is removing the startup sound from Windows 7 to shave off 400 milliseconds from that 3-minute startup time.)

Presto is currently free as a beta, and will cost $20 once it ships in the middle of April.

www.prestomypc.com

If Microsoft Didn't Have a Monopoly, They Wouldn't Exist

I recall sitting in the press conference as then-president of WordPerfect mocked Word and how badly Microsoft implemented its word processor. Two decades later, Word is still a poor product with which to write.

I was reminded of that long-ago incident when a software company today invited me to take part in a new product announcement. Most use WebEx or GotoMeeting. This company decided on Microsoft's Live Meeting, and what a bad choice it made to go with a Microsoft product.

A few minutes before the event was to begin, I did the usual: copy'n pasted the conference URL into FireFox, and then I clicked the Join Meeting button. FireFox downloaded an RTC file, and then Windows asked what it should do with it.

I did a quick google to find that RTC files are for Live Meeting. I read that a client needed to be downloaded manually. How odd, I thought; WebEx and GotoMeeting download clients automatically.

I found the link and began downloading the Live Meeting client. The download proceeded slowly, because the file was large. (WebEx and GottoMeeting clients are small and download quickly). Meanwhile, the online meeting had begun, and I was missing out on the visuals.

Download complete, the installation began... and then halted. The client needed DirectX 9, which was not yet installed on this computer. That's odd: WebEx and GotoMeeting run just fine on this computer, the one that's closest to the phone -- which is why I use it for online meetings.

I switch to my netbook computer, because (1) it runs Windows 7 and I had just installed AutoCAD 2010, which also installed DirectX 9.0; and (2) I could move it close enough to the phone.

The steps started over again: email the conference link to my gmail acct; paste it into FireFox on the netbook; click the Join Meeting button; wait for FIreFox to download the RTC file. 

This time, Windows 7 offered to look for what an RTC file is. It consulted Microsoft's Web site for file extensions, and reported back that the filetype was unknown. WebEx and GotoMeeting don't have this problem.

This time I knew I had to download the Live Meeting client, and so another wait while the obese file downloaded and installed, finally. By now I had missed the first 15 minutes of the meeting -- 15 minutes of Dead Meeting, as it were.

So, again we can see that if Microsoft didn't have it monopoly position, the low quality of its software would have ensured it would have gone out of business long ago.

Microsoft. You will always be #last in my book.

Revealed: Why Microsoft Fails at Search

Microsoft Corp.'s share of Internet searches in the U.S. fell to a 12-month low [of 8.2%], according to a comScore Inc. report on Internet search queries for February.
- Elizabeth Montalbano, Computer World

One aspect I find fascinating about corporate marketing is when they spin their solution to fix problems that don't exist. The reason is Dibert-itis: the product created doesn't solve problem,so a problem must be found for it to solve.

We see Dilbert-itis infecting Microsoft's Satya Nadella, as revealed by Boomtown's Kara Swisher in A Sneak Peek Look at Microsoft’s New Kumo: A Spidery Cloud? A Cloudy Spider?

Here are the problems as he defines them:

  • 40% of queries go unanswered.
  • Half of queries are about searchers returning to previous tasks.
  • 46% of search sessions are longer than 20 minutes.
  • Customers often don’t find what they need from search today.

Do you believe any of the stats? I don't.

Mr Nadella starts off with false assumptions, and then moves on to incorrect solutions.Before you google, you have to have some idea of what you are searching for; Microsofthas no idea what it is searching for, other than the vague goal of "more market share." 

Kill the Fees

Our town has a brand new sports and concert facility. The first event is a concert by Third Day. Tickets are $20 and I was thinking of attending. I checked out the facility's Web site for buying tickets. I didn't buy any. The $20 ticket comes with $15 in fees, including a $2 charge for me to print off the tickets at home.

I'll spend the $35 on buying a couple of Third Day CDs instead.

Avoiding Bank Fees

Reader J.L. writes, " What I need is a lesson." This is a fellow who took out a 7% car loan a year ago, and now can't get a lower one, despite the Bank of Canada rate being 0.5%. 

As I've told my kids, there are two parts to becoming wealthy: (1) make more, and (2) spend less.

In particular, banks don't need more of our money from fees (which includes interest paid on loans and mortgages). For instance, J.L. hoped to get a lower interest on his car loan from ScotiaBank, a bank that yesterday reported $900 million profit for the last three months. Banks remind me of oil companies: the price of oil has fallen 3.6x, but the price of gasoline (In Canada) has fallen only 2x.

Here's the thing: he shouldn't have taken out the loan in the first place. As I tell my kids: save up, then buy. (Don't buy, and then pay interest, which increases the cost of the purchase, and makes you less wealthy.) For our oldest, the advice seems to have taken hold. A couple of years ago, he turned 20, and he and I agreed that he would be on his own when it came to money: whatever he earned, he could spend. I am pleased to see him saving his paycheques (he works as a non-union janitor). He carefully monitors the sales fliers, eBay, and other Websites to know when to pounce and purchase the big-ticket items he wants with cash.

(Actually, he uses a credit card that pays cashback, and then pays it off in full each month.)

Bank Fees

While many banks tout "low monthly fees," you should be looking for no fees. Our son has a no-fee chequing and savings acct with a local credit union. My wife and I have a grandfathered account at our credit union that has no fees. Its Web site lets me pay my bills and transfer funds between family accounts, and charges no fees. 

Some banks waive fees in certain cases. I have a Bank of America account that is fee-free as long as I make at least one direct deposit a month. So, once a month I xfer a nominal amount into it from my PayPal acct.

Banks make tons of money by paying poor interest, and so they have no need to collect fees. Before buying our house in 1991, I spent many hours in front of a spreadsheet, optimizing the mortgage -- which meant figuring out how to minimize the total interest paid to the bank. In addition, I made a very high down payment. As a result, I was able to pay off our mortgage in 2 years. 

(Here's what the spreadsheet told me, stuff that bank didn't tell me. At the then-current interest rate of 11.5%, the optimal mortgage duration was a maximum of 13 years; any longer and the interest payments would balloon. The bank's terms allowed me to increase my monthly payment by 10% once a year, and to pay down the principle by 10% once a year, with no penalty. Those two factors alone would allow me to pay off a 10-year mortgage in 5 years. Note that interest payments are not a tax deduction in Canada, as they are in the USA, and so mortgages tend to be shorter here than there. Because I was unemployed at the time, I began with low monthly mortgage payments. But after two years, I was able paid off the remainder of the mortgage after paying an $850 penalty. It was well worth it.)

High Interest Accounts

To get high interest on saving accts, you have to deal with non-traditional banks. I have such accts with two banks, where I stash cash. A subsidiary acct holds the money one daughter is earning (and saving) towards her 3-week study-travel trip this Spring to Europe. It made her an extra $100 (roughly) in interest in the two years she saved up. She's pretty pleased to have earned the entire cost through the part-time job of notetaking for disabled students at her university. (Her airfare was covered by points she's collected.)

Another subsidiary account holds the rent our son pays us; we are storing it in case of an unexpected need. (Our kids have to pay $400/month rent for living at home, if they no longer attend school.) Which leads to the final topic...

How to Save

One of the keys to wealth is to spend less. I've described some tactics above: don't pay interest; don't pay bank fees; earn higher interest; get cashback or points on credit cards; pay off credit cards in full each month. (Use a debit card, if you can't control your credit card use.)

But the ultimate way to spend less is to have less cash laying around. If I don't know that I have the money, I won't spend it. (This tactic does not work for people with uncontrollable credit card spending.) So I stash income into obscure accounts, and then "forget" about it. 

These are high-interest fee-free accounts where I cannot easily get at the money. For example, AltaMira and ING Bank offer such accts. I don't receive a monthly statement reminding me how much is in the account. I can only get at the money by making a phone call and dealing with the bank's call center (to request a transfer into my regular credit union acct). And I don't like making that call!

I have found this system works well for me ever since I implemented it several years ago. When a regular bank acct has $100 or $2,000 or $30,000 less in it, it's not going to get spent, and I am forced to live on less. I no longer run out of money before the end of the fiscal year, and that's a darn good feeling. 

My other daughter has begun to understand this tactic, and asks me to "hide" some of her income from her. She now sees just $179 in her acct, and has cut back her spending -- instead of seeing $629. She's saving up for a good camera, for which she'll pay cash. 

Summary

This is not about sabotaging the economy by spending less. This is about spending wisely. I was happy to pay an interior designer and a craftsman $16,000 to remodel my office ten years ago, because I hadn't given the $16,000 to a bank for mortgage payments.

It takes some effort, but it gets easier as you get used to doing it. But I recognize that this way of living financially is not built into some people's genes, and it may well be impossible for them to follow. For  others, it is possible to live in a manner that displeases the banks. 

3 Tips for Prolonging the Recession

A recent poll of Americans indicates they feel the bad times might last as long as five years. Here are some ways to ensure the recession lasts that long:

1. Fewer Customers? Raise Your Prices.

Toronto's international airport is the most expensive in the word, in terms of fees charged to airlines and passengers. To offset the smaller number of passengers expected this summer, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority is increasing the exit tax (aka airport improvement fee) from $20 to $25 per passenger. 

business.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090213.wpearson0213/BNStory/Business/home


2. Paid Too Much Income? Spend Less of It.

NBC's Brian Williams makes  $10 million a year, but he is going to help extend the recession by keeping his millions in the bank, and reducing support for struggling businesses. "I've had no desire to walk into any store but a grocery store for months."

www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/williams_on_nightlys_bounce_we_havent_seen_these_numbers_in_a_long_time_108574.asp


3. Bank Unhealthy? Micromanage Them Globally

The (unelected) prime minister of English declares that banks are suffering globally, and so they are in need of a global regulatory agency: "There is a global banking collapse that we're dealing with consequences of in every country" -- not! He hasn't been to Canada (clearly), where the Royal Bank of Canada last week announced $1 billion in profits, and it's not even the largest bank we have. Canada doesn't have the American-made, European-mimicked banking problem, and I wonder how many other countries also don't. 

In any case, a global regulatory agency would be as (in)effective as the UN in handling the world's woes. Money is the ultimate corrupter, and much effort would be spent by the moneyed types to avoid detection by the agency, even buying off its agents (cf. UN-run Oil-for-Food program) -- rendering it pointless, except for those who preen themselves for being part of the globe-trotting, 5-star-hotel-staying superagency.

www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101370077

I'd Like to See: Monitor Partitioning

My dad wanted a new desktop computer last fall, so I bought him one, complete with a 23" LCD monitor running at 2048x1158 resolution. Then he decided it was too confusing to have a notebook and a desktop computer, and gave the brand new system to me.

The monitor is almost too big. Open a Web browser, maximize its window, and there is lots of blank space on either side of the Web page. Which got me to thinking...

How if the operating system could partition the monitor, just as hard drives are partitioned. For example, partition by 2/3 and 1/3: maximize a program's window, and it takes up only 2/3 of the screen -- instead of 100% of the screen. This is a way to have two screens without needing two physical monitors.

We have the barest hint of partitioning with the sidebar found in Vista and 7. There is the Show Windows Side by Side option, but it is manually invoked.

I'd like to see something along the lines of AutoCAD's MView command, where you split the screen into independent viewports -- a big one for the main app(s), plus a few smaller ones for utility apps, like file manager, email, and so on.

There is a hardware solution today, in the form of 8" side monitors that plug into a spare USB port.

Warning: The Source Overcharges

Today's email blast from The Source (the Canadian version of Circuit City) highlights gaming computers. The first item is the ACER ASPIRE AM5700-E5731A DESKTOP COMPUTER GAMING BUNDLE, which comes with a 7200rpm 640GB hard drive.

Red all-caps text, however, screams that you can UPGRADE TO 1TB FOR $650. Surely 1TB of RAM, I thought. After all, these days 1TB drives are under $200 and some even around $100. I checked the specs for the ACER ASPIRE AM7720-E7730A DESKTOP COMPUTER GAMERS BUNDLE but no, the extra $650 was for an added 320GB worth of disk space. Works out to $2.03 per gigabyte.

The site doesn't seem to sell internal drives, but one of their 1GB external drives is a mere $250 (works out to 25 cents per gigabyte).

The Source is operating under bankruptcy protection in Canada, and so I can see why it might want to charge 8x more for the larger hard drive.