« About Dassault's other 3D modeling kernel, CGM | Main | ASUS has a big problem with its TF101 batteries »

Sep 26, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jon Banquer

What's needed is an announcement by a CADCAM company not owned by Dassault that they are going to implement the CGM kernel.

Questions I have:

How much of the surfacing functionality that is in Catia is in the CGM kernel?

In a history based modeler can the CGM kernel provide significant speed advantages over Siemens Parasolid by taking advantage of concurrency?

It sure would be nice to see head to head performance comparisons between Siemens Parasolid and Dassault CGM.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Search This Blog


  •  

Translate

Advertisements


Thank you for visiting!