« You can now read WorldCAD Access by email | Main | Running browserCAD on Android »

Jun 06, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tom Kunsman

I am sure that Trimble also wanted SketchUp to increas the ever growing BIM tools. They do own Tekla also.

Brian

I'm not sure how Tremble is not a Cad vendor. In 5 years time they will be Autodesks biggest BIM competitors.

Michael

Interesting theory. Tekla is the bomb and has been getting a lot of attention in the recent years. In Europe anyway. I am sure that Sketchup will be a great asset to them.

Joe Croser

Interesting stuff Ralph, thanks for sharing. I welcome this new development from Google, Bing's bird's eye view is often a useful alternative to Google's aerial view. Will be nice to have both in one place.

Stray Kat

I wonder if Google will actually try to fly over Every part of the earth to render these buildings. IT seems like there are many places where it wouldn't be practical or cost-effective for Google to put out the logistical expense of collecting their new stereoscopic imagery.

For the moment, it sounds like Google Earth SketchUp modeling will continue for areas with a smaller populations.

In my opinion, the new solution seems more efficient, but less effective. Stereoscopic-extruded 3D mesh still looks terrible once you get within a hundred feet.

I had hoped that, if Google was aiming for efficiency, they would start providing LiDAR data instead of Building Maker, along with tools to convert the point cloud data to SketchUp models and terrain. It would have been slower, but ultimately produced a better product.

I guess they figure that by the time that process was completed, another better, newer, faster technology will exist.

I just get the feeling that the new stereoscopic approach is a patch. A quick and dirty way to compete with Apple.

I just hope that they allow both viewing options; that they continue supporting SketchUp models on the desktop, at least as an alternate option.

And this does also beg the question of what they will do with Google Earth Enterprise.

Vertex Modelling

Whilst I love how Google is in the forefront of creating accessible 3D models of cities, I agree with Stray Kat that stereoscopic-extruded 3D mesh still looks terrible once you get within a hundred feet. There are also issues with separating trees and foliage from models of buildings, modelling of bridges, overhanging structures and of course automated model extractions of so-called urban canyons.

Marksman619

sorry to resurect an older topic, but the stereoscopic-extrusions are not meant to be high definition models for close up viewing. The google street view gives you a close up photo realistic view of an area, the 3d Extrusions are for the aerial fly through that you can do in "Fly" mode. cool feature for buzzing through canyons and valleys, or taking an aerial tour of a city. It would be cool if they could automate a visual recognition program that could search the library for components and models to populate an area or build a structure. Right now however, For realistic 3d walk through of a building or structure, they will still need models done by hand.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Thank you for visiting!

Translate

Search This Blog


  •  

Advertisements